Sinn Féin definitively rules out forming an Executive with the DUP unless it radically overhauls its policies – By Declan Kearney

Social share:


I’ve been wondering lately whether anyone in Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) leadership circles actually tries to reflect upon what republicans, nationalists, and other progressive minded citizens think about the current political situation.

Do they even care what others think?

The evidence suggests not.

Several days ago the DUP leader pronounced that her party could and would change the Good Friday Agreement (GFA) at a whim. There was no hint of irony in her claim – the DUP has spent the last 20 years opposing the GFA, ever since it was signed.

In another extraordinary, but not untypical, outburst she declared her ‘blood red line’ position on Brexit; and, that in the same week as the consultation on dealing with the past was concluding!

Of course the DUP leader, and other key figures have form in making offensive and provocative political interventions.

Her dehumanising description of republicans as “crocodiles” in 2017 comes to mind.

Notably, she previously called republican and nationalist Ministers in a functioning Executive ‘rogues and renegades’.

Only the DUP knows whether this leader is naturally predisposed to being rhetorically gaffe prone, or is being deliberately offensive.

Perhaps some figures in the DUP do think about wider opinion: the DUP is not a monolith after all.

But, those currently in charge of the DUP have turned away from power sharing. They oppose equality and rights, and reject reconciliation.

Instead they have chosen to join forces with the extremists in the British Tory party to help steer the Brexit train wreck.

The DUP leadership is living in a delusional bubble.

Meanwhile, the party brand has become indistinguishable from the financial scandals of recent years; such as Red Sky, NAMA, Brexit ‘dark money’, and financial relationships with Sri Lanka.

The ongoing RHI inquiry exposé of how the DUP behaved in government makes a complete mockery of its purported adherence to ‘good governance’.

The party MPs have become power drunk through their pact with the Tories, and a serious misconception that they are king makers in Westminster.

Edward Carson’s cautionary words have clearly been forgotten or disregarded.  He warned;

‘What a fool I was.  I was only a puppet, and so was Ulster… in the political game that was to get the Conservative party into power.’

The DUP has a tactical approach towards everything; including maintaining the status quo on its own terms, slowing down and frustrating progressive societal change, and maintaining sectarian dominance within the unionist constituency.

The DUP leadership is permanently in conflict with all accepted democratic norms, social modernity, political integrity, and standards in public office.

Its inability and refusal to embrace difference or celebrate diversity is reflected in an institutionalised bigotry against, and intolerance towards the Irish national identity and cultural traditions, and LGBT rights.

The party’s contempt and sharp practice in government have destroyed wider public confidence in the political institutions, and led to the decisive tipping point of RHI and withdrawal of the Líofa grant scheme in the winter of 2016.

As a result of its ingrained arrogance and lack of political humility the DUP leadership is constantly in denial about how society in Ireland views its sectarianism, homophobia, and toxic pact with the Tories.

The overwhelming majority of republicans, nationalists, and many others, including sections of civic unionism, do not believe the DUP is serious about restoring genuine power sharing.

These citizens want the institutions to be restored, but not at the risk of allowing the DUP to continue practicing discrimination, disrespect, intimidation, bigotry, and sharp practice.

They will not be giving the DUP permission to get back into power on that basis and neither will Sinn Féin.

The DUP’s behaviour, and the onslaught of Brexit have together brought back graphically into focus the denial of rights which resulted in the Civil Rights Movement fifty years ago.

A generational realignment has occurred within northern nationalism.

Acht Gaeilge, marriage equality, women’s reproductive health rights, legacy justice rights, and the demand for a Bill of Rights are the modern day acid test equivalents of one person, one vote.

The current crisis in the north of Ireland is the visceral culmination of 20 years of DUP push back against the GFA.

Intoxicated with its imaginary power at Westminster, the DUP leadership has finally over played its hand.

The political institutions could have been re-established by the 19th February last, but the DUP leaders walked out of negotiations.

Instead of selling the deal which they negotiated in February with Sinn Féin, the DUP leader, deputy leader, party chief executive, and itssenior talks team bottled out.

Since then the party has been convulsed with the resultant internal fall out. There has been no meaningful contact with Sinn Féin, and absolutely no willingness demonstrated to resume negotiations.

Any advocacy of ‘blood red lines’ is a total anathema to democracy.

The wider nationalist constituency is fed up to the back teeth with the subversion of the political process by the DUP, the British Tory government and others in political unionism.

It is more impatient than ever for equality, rights and parity of esteem.

The history of 1968 is being replayed. Thousands marching from Duke Street in Derry city on Saturday 6th October to mark the iconic civil rights march 50 years before is the latest example of that.

An exciting momentum for change is taking place across Ireland, north and south. Old orthodoxies are being eclipsed by discussions about new, modern, all-Ireland constitutional and political arrangements.

The permanent unionist electoral majority is gone and demographic changes are irreversible.

All of this puts the onus back upon both governments to act decisively to address the denial of rights.

The Irish government needs to take the lead because for now the DUP has this British government over a barrel. That’s a short-term situation.  A British general election in the immediate to mid term cannot be ruled out.

A new political discourse has begun about the future. All sections of society need to be involved in this and the unionist is critical in all of this.

Brexit, the GFA, citizen’s rights, and an Irish unity referendum are central to that.

Progressives should explore common ground and alliances for change.

Republicans and unionists need to start to face the same way. We have to begin looking at each other through eyes of the future.

The benchmarks of a rights-based society guaranteeing civil and religious liberties and equality for all, are set. These are not negotiable.

So, whoever is actually in charge of the DUP for the time being has a lot of serious thinking to do…

Who now leads the DUP?

Do they have the authority to negotiate and stick to an agreement?

Are they committed to a shared future with republicans, nationalists, and others in the north?

Unless, and until the DUP can clearly answer these questions for the rest of society, it will remain exactly where it is now – out of power, and facing the inevitable fate about which Carson warned: getting dumped by the British Tories.

Social share:

About Author


  1. Jake MacSiacais on

    The February proto deal was so deeply flawed that I felt moved on TV to describe it as ‘a mess of pottage’.
    I believe SF were fortunate that the DUP ‘bottled it.
    Arlene and co are unfit to hold power and ‘the generationally realigned nationalism’ will view harshly any move to place an unreconstructed unionism in any position of power which they will surely abuse.

  2. I’d disagree that the permanent pro-Union electoral majority is gone, presently.

    Indeed I have and do argue for a border poll as soon as possible to quantify the said numbers that are, in actual fact, pro-Union with the UK or pro-Union with the EU (note I didn’t mention Nationalist or indeed Republican, anywhere, just there).

    I don’t doubt, Declan, that demographic changes are irreversible but here in 2018 and looking ahead at the horizon they can’t be as easily defined as “Nationalist” & them there “Progressives”.

    And so, I’m drawn back to the Border Poll, that ultimate leveller of Nationalistic bullshit! Let’s have it.

    Unless, and until Citizens can freely and clearly express the question of being pro-UK or pro-EU then the tribal / religious nonsense that bleats “nationalism” (whether the British or Irish version) will plague here.

    Let’s not remain exactly where it all is now – all parties out of power, and facing the inevitable fate of the people becoming completely apathetic to their sound bites and enamoured to never vote again.

    Let the people of Northern Ireland say we are pro-UK or pro-EU, let the people of Northern Ireland choose the future of this tiny replace based on what is best for their quality of life regardless of any local jingoistic “nationalist” vibe.

    As for Jakes comment on “unreconstructed Unionism”. You need to seriously consider how you are a reverse mirror image of that adjective.

    What ever the future of Ireland: it won’t be built on a patriot green version of nationalism, a jade tinge of progressives or a conservative blue strike of unreconstructed Unionism.

  3. Jake MacSiacais on

    Glen I agree that stuck where we are is the least desirable outcome. I think the dynamics have changed utterly and that Brexit offers an opportunity to rethink how we share this piece of ground which we will all continue to occupy for the very long term future. The old tribal politics are outmoded. The status quo ante only balkanises the place further and reinforces sectarianism.
    A border poll should be campaigned for but kept out of the hands of political parties and based on very clearly articulated preferences and not a simple binary choice. I have no desire to join the current partitionist right wing state in the south but rather desire a reordered agreed Ireland which serves people’s needs.
    Notice I also mentioned none of the nationalisms.

    • Thanks for courtesy of reply Jake.

      Where is the vision?

      Where is the articulation of what this tiny place is doing or going?

      Good leaders create, articulate & passionately, relentlessly, drive a vision to completion!

      Where is our vision of leadership to improve quality of life for all, here?

      A wonderful opportunity has been squandered.

      • Your a very good man Glenn-I follow your posts on Twitter and admire many of the things you are involved in and friendships you have made

  4. The Good Friday Agreement is dead and offers nothing. There should be no return of the Execuitve and Assembly under its guise. It makes a farce of politics.

  5. Declan Kearney would do well to reflect on the activities of one Oliver Kearney and his campaign of Equality which was a campaign to target employers in Northern Ireland with a preceived bias of over representation of Protestants-I worked for such a company and well remember the attempts of Equality to put me out of work by way of an organised boycott of my employer-Needless to say Company’s in Northern Ireland with an over representation of Catholics in their workforce were ignored by Equality-I remember it well Declan-any comments?-Also why did the last Minister of Finance in the Executive need to consult a certain Ted Howell before making a decision ?-Come on Declan tell us !!

Leave A Reply