Lifting the Siege: a new Unionism, a new Northern Ireland – By Philip Smith – Ulster Unionist

Social share:


A siege mentality. The cliché that for many encompasses the unionist political psyche. Historically all sieges result in relief or defeat for the besieged or occasionally a negotiated settlement.

Despite the DUP’s current Tory deal, no-one is likely to come forth to relieve unionism’s siege and defeat is not palatable. So persuasion and negotiation appear to be the only credible option.

To succeed in the long term unionism needs to change not only its tactics but also its mindset.

A ‘new unionism’ is required if the Union is to be sustained well beyond the Northern Ireland centenary in 2021.

It’s a common view that Northern Ireland’s continued place in the Union is running out of time, the siege is about to end, and to end not because the vast majority of the besieged have given up, but because their proportion of the population has fallen below the critical level.

Democracy of 50% plus one will deliver constitutional change. So believe the most ardent Irish Republicans who have been content to end physical force in the expectation that demographics will deliver the outcome they desire. Unionism has a strong case that if put well can persuade a comfortable majority to support the current constitutional situation in the longer term. Furthermore, the future demographics may not be as clear cut as some believe.

The 2011 Census showed that while there was still an overall Protestant majority there were more Catholics than Protestants from the age of 36 (now 43) and below and this demographic evidence has been used to predict the end of the Union within the next decade or two.

The 2017 Assembly election results reinforced this narrative of an endless march towards Irish unity as political unionism became a minority in Northern Ireland for the first time.

The Catholic birth rate while falling, is still significantly higher than the Protestant population. For example, of the 13,587 families in 2011 with 4 or more dependent children, 8,216 were Catholic.

However, that expectation, so long anticipated by Sinn Fein, may not deliver the hoped for outcome. One of the main demographic changes in recent years in Northern Ireland has been the significant increase in those stating that they have no religion. In the 2011 Census less than 1% of 75 year olds identified as having no religion yet this increased to over 15% for those born in the year running up to the census. What is seldom stated is that those with no religion predominantly define themselves as British (63%) as do those from other religions (53%). Only 10% and 12% respectively self-identified as Irish and the rest Northern Irish. Of course, while religion is an important element in identifying political allegiance in Northern Ireland, it does not tell the full story. In 2011 109,000 Catholics identified as British along with a further 250,000 who defined themselves as Northern Irish. Thus poll after poll that shows that the desire for constitutional change is limited to less than a third of the population.

None of this should encourage unionist complacency. Brexit has the potential to be a game changer if handled badly and while the threat of Scottish independence and its impact on the wider Union has diminished, the issue is still alive but unionism is still very much in the game and much depends upon its approach and message in the years ahead.

For long term stability and success in Northern Ireland unionists must persuade all stakeholders that any change in our constitutional status will happen incrementally, if at all. The medium term forecast based upon voting figures and demography suggest a constitutional stalemate with inertia favouring the status quo for those with no hard preference.

Unionism’s challenge is to make the existing constitutional status either the preference or fall-back position for a continuing majority in Northern Ireland, and more importantly for the undecided centre.

If there is no constitutional change on the horizon, reinforced by the economic, political and social benefits of the Union, then the NI body politic needs to accept that a functioning Stormont is key to future success.

The absence of a functioning Assembly and Executive will increase political instability and, along with the potential impact of Brexit, lead to lower economic growth and worse public services. In saying that, the simple return of Stormont is no panacea.

Having witnessed our devolved government up close, even for only a short period, it was enough to realise that the structures designed to resolve conflict and sustain peace are not fit for delivering joined up, effective government. The brief 2016 Assembly may be remembered for the RHI debacle but it was also the Executive without a budget or an agreed Programme for Government. Reform was slow and decision making tortured.

The current hiatus in devolution provides an opportunity to negotiate reformed structures for Stormont to deliver better government for all the people of Northern Ireland.

Returning to the Belfast Agreement process for designation of First Ministers, developing a form of power sharing to include voluntary coalition and making local councils truly ‘super’ by devolving more power and responsibility should all be introduced.

Radical decisions are needed if the required action on health, the economy and infrastructure is to be taken.

Each section of our community faces its own political challenges. Irish republicans should understand what the political parties in Dublin have long accepted in that Irish unity is on the ‘long finger’ at best and that unionists must be persuaded if they are ever to achieve constitutional change. That is not to diminish Sinn Fein or the SDLP’s right to campaign for a united Ireland but to acknowledge that working together to achieve long term political stability will deliver better outcomes for the people they represent.

Unionists in turn must accept that the days of being in a majority are gone and that Irish nationalism must be treated as partners in the governing of Northern Ireland including showing respect for Irish culture.

Furthermore, a liberalisation of social mores and attitudes, especially amongst the young, requires Northern Ireland to better reflect wider UK attitudes on social issues. The famous line from di Lampedusa’s novel The Leopard should resonate with unionists ‘If we want things to stay as they are, things will have to change’.

For nationalists and republicans Northern Ireland will never be as British as Finchley and for unionists it will never be as Irish as Finglas. We have a unique stalemate which may become a political war of attrition, benefiting no-one. Or we can choose to park our constitutional issues and build a better society for us all. The status quo is the only show in town for the foreseeable future.

Both traditions must accept that a successful Northern Ireland requires a local government that will work to benefit all the people and, most importantly, a government that everyone wants to succeed. Northern Ireland has enough socio-economic challenges without choosing to add continual political upheaval to exacerbate our many existing difficulties.

Unionists must realise that a combination of Brexit and Conservative Direct Rule will not enhance the Union in the long term nor will republicans and nationalists achieve success by hoping for a Border Poll and fighting a decades long battle to achieve their ’50 % plus one’.

No matter their constitutional preference or chosen nationality, everyone in Northern Ireland has a vested interest in making this place a success. Even the most ardent Irish republican must see that a prosperous and stable Northern Ireland will have a greater chance of being successfully assimilated into a new Republic.

Similarly unionists should understand that in an era of Brexit and greater regional devolution it is wise for Northern Ireland to minimise its burden on the wider UK taxpayer. Furthermore only by creating greater economic success, developing a more modern society and ensuring political stability will the Union be secured.

‘New unionism’ therefore requires three fundamental changes from its more traditional approach.

Firstly, unionism must become future focused. A fixation with history is not unique to unionism but some unionists appear to be more comfortable commemorating past successes than building for the future. While it is important to learn from our past and commemorate key historical events as part of our cultural legacy there is a danger of unionism becoming an anachronism.

Unionism’s focus should be on articulating a vision for a successful Northern Ireland within the UK and engaging the widest possible audience in support of that goal. Widening unionism does not diminish it, in fact, it is the only way to guarantee its future success.

Greater engagement with younger voters is also essential to counter the growing narrative that unionism is the politics of the old. A recent Lucidtalk poll had 56% of those aged between 18 and 44 supporting a united Ireland. To change that trend unionism must show how it can better help those aspiring for a better tomorrow.

Secondly, unionism must be more open and welcoming. One of the main selling points of the Union is that it secures our place in a modern, dynamic country whose economy and power has a global reach, and has the diversity that makes London the capital of the world.
Yet unionism too often comes across as narrow, exclusive and intolerant, making it easy for its opponents to criticise and paint it as bigoted and sectarian. Being part of a diverse, modern Britain should be an easy sell to many who are agnostic on the Union. This is a key audience which makes up as much as 10% of the electorate and who will play a critical role in deciding the future direction of Northern Ireland.

Our goal should be to engage and win over this demographic and not repel it through a one dimensional definition of unionism.

Thirdly, unionism must embrace partnership government. While unionist parties have led the devolved Northern Ireland Executive since its formation in 1999 it is perceived to be sharing power through gritted teeth. Unionism needs to be generous both politically and culturally, as only by sharing power can unionism retain it in the longer term. Greater efforts at Stormont and in council chambers across Northern Ireland to engage with nationalist and other parties will show that Northern Ireland can be a ‘warm house’ for all.

Engagement with Irish cultural groups and organisations and a willingness to respect Irishness and Irish identity within Northern Ireland is a necessary step in moving forward from the past.

These changes will lead to a more vibrant and confident unionism that is not fearful for the future and that can attract support from non-traditional areas. By modernising and undertaking more outreach unionism will strengthen and improve its long term viability. For many it may be counter-intuitive but by breaking out of its siege mentality unionism is more likely to prosper and grow.

While unionism needs to change it cannot make Northern Ireland a success on its own. Sinn Fein, the SDLP and the other parties must also play their part. Generosity is required on all sides and a desire to make Northern Ireland work. To misquote former Prime Minister Terence O’Neill, Northern Ireland is once again approaching a crossroads and we have a choice over which road we will take.

Essentially we have two options; we either learn to share Northern Ireland and agree to work together to make this place the best it can be or we can indulge in a long term war of political attrition with the danger that we slip back into violence. Surely the choice is obvious. If we have learnt nothing else from our brutal and futile Troubles then at least let us all understand that killing your opponents with kindness must be a better policy than just killing them. There is a positive future for everyone in Northern Ireland, we just have to take the right road.

Social share:

About Author

Avatar photo

I am a regular contributor to discussion programmes on TV and radio both at home and abroad. An experienced political editor and author specialising in Politics, Security and 20th Century Art.


  1. Mr John Lavery on

    Unionism to change and embrace equality? – too late – beware the chickens coming home to roost and the trojan horse of equality being delivered through Brexit – all due to lack of vision in the Unionist leadership. Meanwhile the Shinners sit on their hands and marvel at what can be achieved by doing nothing.

  2. Expecting Unionism to change is like expecting the wind not to blow – it’s dubious in the short run and highly unlikely in the long. Only comprehensive defeat (or an absolute victory, which in this case is impossible) can get rid of a siege mentality.

  3. When Unionists disentangle themselves from the Orange Order, the Freemasons, and other secret brotherhoods, only then will I believe they have changed.

  4. Good stuff. This is very similar to the vision of Conservative & Unionist link up 2008-12 and sadly ditched by UUP in 2011/12 – an inclusive tolerant unionism open to all, a unionism that could move out of its comfort zone and become persuaders of the Union.
    Meanwhile we’ve had 6 wasted years of cultural war and a race to the bottom in super unionism with little difference between UUP and DUP

  5. Good piece. If I were a unionist I’d be shouting this from the rooftops.

    Where’s the forward-thinking stuff coming from Republicans about how to convince Unionists or undecideds of the merits of a united Ireland (if I’m wrong, please post a link!)? I just see fingers pointing at demographics. If the strategy is ’50+1, job done’, it’s sorely lacking.

    For a stable move to a United Ireland, a large proportion, if not a majority, of unionists would have to be in favour. As Churchill said, “You must get those fellows in the North in”.

    How to persuade them? Sinn Fein will never do it. Too much baggage. A real strategy for a UI would see SF phased out.

    The best recruiting sergeant for UI right now is the evident disregard for NI at Westminster and in Britain in general.

    Additionally, as the article says, NI needs an economic revolution before Ireland could afford it. What is the Republican thinking on how to deliver that?

    One point i think the writer is well wide of the mark on: the appeal of the UK as ‘diverse and modern’. Brexit vote has really damaged that image of Britain. And I’m not sure diversity is a big selling point anyway (anywhere in the world, bar among immigrant populations and the (minority) ‘metropolitan elites’).

  6. I remember Peter Robinson’s attempt at this and the exile from the DUP he received in response. Other authors are Lundied out of of political Unionism and never heard from again.

    Unionism cannot even bring itself to sign up to the GFA/SSA to get Stormont back. When it is clearly in its own interests to do so.

  7. As ever a unionist cannot describe what is so good about unionism, compared to nationalism in the 21st century.
    Unionists cling to this belief doggedly without ever showing how & why it is better than any alternative and why Irish unity is such a bad idea.
    We have heard about a ‘new unionism’ repeatedly for 50 years, ever since Terence O’Neill made his speech ‘Ulster at the crossroads’ in 1968. Every unionist leader since has had a go at re-modelling unionism. It hasn’t worked.
    Today the fixation is all with the statistics of demographics. In 1912 with the Ulster Covenant it was all about the money. Both approaches were equally empty of ideals. That’s why unionism is dying. It does not inspire. Its the rhetoric of ‘what we have we hold’.

  8. The analysis contained within this article is overly simplistic on two accounts. The fear over demographic change does not take account of the many Roman Catholics who would vote for the Constitutional status quo. By predicting Constitutional change on sheer numbers of Protestants and Roman Catholics is simplistic. It is a simplistic means of viewing the Constitutional status of Northern Ireland, promoted by the media and academic classes over the years. You can be Roman Catholic, but not a Nationalist and Protestant, but not a Unionist.

    Furthermore, yes, the March 2017 Assembly election was bad for Unionism, especially the DUP. This was due to numerous factors with RHI floated by Sinn Fein as a means of dissuading Unionists of voting DUP and shoring up the Sinn Fein vote – through gaining new voters, namely former SDLP, and maximising their turnout (which was on the decline). The seat makeup was also a factor. Five seats per constituency did not benefit Unionism, but Sinn Fein as the dominant party of Republicanism/Nationalist.

    There is also a factor at play with each and every election in NI fought on sectarian grounds. While each election has been seen as a mini-referendum on the Constitutional status of NI, this (given a large support from those who identify as RC in support of maintaining the Constitutional status of NI – see NIL&T surveys) may not be reflected in any Referendum on the Border.

  9. An interesting analysis and some good points made. I think the author is fooling himself if he thinks London is the ‘capital of the world’ and it definitely wouldn’t be post Brexit.
    I often feel Unionists want to be English yet the majority of English couldn’t give tuppence about them and would get rid of NI in a shot. Look at the money they’d save.
    I’m not convinced the folk in the Republic are eagerly awaiting the folk from the North either.
    Guess we are ‘nobody’s children’.

  10. Where you you begin with this?

    Unionism had 70, in fact 95 years to embrace change, and still hasn’t as evidence of 2017 has revealed.

    Too late lads, it would be better you began discussing how a new Ireland can accommodate your version of unionism and that’s the truth.

    Another point is that he mentioned the “no religion” census tickers as somehow more unionist-leading. I fear this may not be the case from my own experience but this is what unionism has been left to cling to.

    It used to be “the majority in Northern Ireland are British” and now faced with the demographic reality, the narrative has changed to “aye but there’s loads of catholic unionists”

    Unionism is a warped ideology.

  11. I used to think I’d like to live in Britain in my retirement – for family reasons. Since the calamitous Brexit vote I wouldn’t dream of it. I don’t want to live in a comic book Little England, no matter how plucky and brave its little-minded inhabitants think they are. Doubtless, I’d not be welcome anyway!

  12. IRELANDthirtytwo on

    IRELAND has 32 Counties including Fermanagh Antrim Tyrone Derry Armagh Down *(its called On England’s Passports Cos don’t forget Welsh Scottish and North Irish people You’re Not English or Westminsterish

    Bit of a joke really yesss very strange SCOTLAND WALES tut tut .. (but y’all share an island so deal with it

    But so far as the Occupied six is concerned. > > wake up “to quote George Galloway ” NORTH IRELAND is not British it couldn’t be if it tried

    UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN & & & & & &. Addition added on, annexed NORTH IRELAND


    Our Day will come, do you realise the damage you’ve done for generations HOUSES OF MUCK In westmister…. bane of generations lives in IRELAND

    & also even if you’re Protestant Sique Hindu in Fermanagh or Belfast wanna be ashamed of yourself not realising the above aforementioned scummy Loyalism to another countries whims

    Imagine a bit of Holland annexed off… Imagine a bit of Belgium annexed off, imagine a bit of Norway Annexed off

    Also the 12th of July *(people who fly from england and Scotland to attend this are 40 times worse than the actuaL oRANGE Persuasion Folk .. again , ASHAMED OF YOURSELVES. Literally it’s very Logical !!!

Leave A Reply